Sandown Lands Nairn

"The Highland Council has agreed to rescind, without penalty, the missives it signed with Deveron Homes Ltd over the development of the Sandown Lands, Nairn.

Deveron Homes, who entered into an agreement with the Council in August 2007, asked to be freed from the agreement after failing to receive planning permission for a major housing development on the western outskirts of the town due to the proposed density of the homes being too high.

The development potential of the Sandown site, owned by Nairn Common Good Fund, is now to be reassessed with a preparation of a Development Brief, which will take into account a public local inquiry and consultation with the local community.

A report will be presented to the Council’s Planning, Environment and Development Committee in March 2011, setting out the timescales for the preparation of a Development Brief for the Sandown Lands and the form of community engagement to be used in the process."

Extract from THC News Release web page published 17/12/10

Asda has gone to the Court of Session to challenge Highland Council’s decision...

From the Press and Journal today (thanks to APT contact for info)

Extract

Retail giant Asda has gone to the Court of Session to challenge Highland Council’s decision to grant planning permission for a £500million new town on the outskirts of Inverness, it was revealed yesterday.

Applicants Inverness Estates, a consortium of developers, plan to build 2,500 new homes, a primary school, shops, a community building including a library, a restaurant and cafe, hotel, health centre and church at the site at Stratton Farm, east of Inverness. The development would be in four phases over the next 20 years.

An Asda spokeswoman said a statement would be issued later.

Read more: http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/2057688#ixzz18OQiKWZT

Read more: http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/2057688#ixzz18O3cF3ka

The planning application for 'Stratton Farm New Town' was put in front of the full council on 15 September 2010 prior to the start of the consultation on the Proposed Highland-wide Local Development Plan.

The Policy Assessment in the committee report for the 15 September noted:

Although there is a measure of support in the Structure Plan Spatial Strategy (paragraph 1.6 of Structure Plan) the application proposals do not fully comply with the planning guidance as set out through the Specific Land Use Policies and Proposals in the Inverness Local Plan, therefore, the application is overall judged as significantly contrary to the approved Development Plan.

However, the most up to date local land use planning framework against which to assess the application proposal is set out through the Highland wide Local Development (HwLDP) rather than the Local Plan (on the basis that the Local Plan does not cover the first years of occupation of the proposed development). The HwLDP has now gone through a process of statutory consultation and is informed by community engagement and the best available information and predictive modelling. This application is therefore being brought forward and is capable of being in in general conformity with the HwLDP Proposed Plan with regard to uses, 17 levels of development and phasing once a Section 75 legal agreement has been put in place.

The extract from the 'Policy Assessment' above mentions that the HwLDP had gone through 'a process of statutory consultation', this was the Main Issues Report for the HwLDP; however as you will have noted from the previous blog post, there was still a long way to go in the statutory Highland-wide Local Development Plan process as a whole in terms of finalising the Proposed Plan - a Plan with which the application '...is capable of being in in general conformity with...'

In order to facilitate this early consideration of the planning application you may recall that councillors of the Planning, Environment and Development Committee, agenda item 9, agreed (amongst other things) on the 11th August 2010 that:

Current major development schemes at Tornagrain, Cawdor and South Nairn (and any which were subsequently submitted) which did not have adopted Local Plan support in full or in part, and which were identified in the Highland-wide Local Development Plan, be taken forward in the context of the ongoing Local Development Plan work and no decisions taken on these schemes until the results of the examination of the Plan were known; and

All proposals in the A96 corridor which had a measure of adopted Local Plan support (in full or in part) could be determined in advance of the Local Development Plan Examination in line with updated guidance in the Proposed Plan;

The proposals for the Stratton Development fell under the latter point in that they were judged to have "...a measure of adopted plan support...".

It will be very interesting to read the promised statement made on behalf of ASDA, although at the determination of the planning application on the 15 Sept the council's solicitor had stated in response to what the P and J describe as ASDA's '11th hour objection':

"Those of you Members that are on the PED committee will be aware that on the 11^th August it was agreed that the East Inverness application could be determined ahead of the Highland wide development plan examination – that’s the part of the process where objections to the plan are examined by a Scottish Government reporter. Therefore there’s already democratic governance of this particular matter. Given the decision by PED my advice to the Council is that this application can be determined today. If you decide to determine the application following the hearing that’s going to take place, this is a procedural decision and it may be challenged by any third party; but it is up to that third party to take that decision. Obviously it is for them to decide. However, I’m satisfied that the Council has grounds to defend the decision to proceed to determine the application today. Thank you, Chair"





[The Stratton proposals themselves had emerged from the A96 masterplanning exercises for East Inverness (which formed the basis of the concise strategy document the 'A96 Growth Corridor Development Framework')

Details of the emergence of the Stratton proposals can be found in the 'Update Newsletters' (see immediately below) and other information (also listed below) from the Council web site's A96 Corridor Masterplan page

Update Newsletters

• Newsletter 7 - August 2008 (1619kb)
• Newsletter 6 - February 2007 (1440kb)
• Newsletter 5 - November 2006 (1625kb)
• Newsletter 4 - August 2006 (2952kb)
• Newsletter 3 - July 2006 (242kb)
• Newsletter 2 - June 2006 (398kb)
• Newsletter 1 - May 2006 (378kb)

• Collaboration for Success Component One Invitees and Attendees
  • Attendees
  • Invitees - East Inverness
  • Invitees - Nairn South
• Options’ Output Assumptions
  • Inverness East Outputs
  • Nairn South Outputs

Inverness

• Inverness East CfS2 Assessment
• Consultants' Assessment
  • Halcrow - Technical Options Appraisal - East Inverness
  • Halcrow - Traffic Option Note
  • Halcrow - Planning Assessment
  • F.G. Burnett - Review of Options - Inverness
  • Turner & Townsend - A96 Options Report
  • Whatmore - Appraisal
• Submission Assessment - East Inverness

Questions and Answers: Part 2

Question:

If an LDP has 'emerged' as far as publication of the PP - but this PP still awaits consultation and examination - can the thought be entertained that once the PP is published then that is it and the rest of the development plan process is just a 'formality' with the likelihood of any significant alteration being made to the PP as a result of a representation being a remote possibility?

Answer:

"...there is still a long way to go in terms of finalising the Proposed Plan once it is published for consultation, particularly if representations and objections to the Proposed Plan can't be resolved. Generally, the Reporters recommendations are binding, so they will have to be incorporated into the plan. During this consultation and examination stage, it is therefore still possible for stakeholders to get objectionable policies (open space designated for housing, proposed route of a new road etc) removed from the Proposed Plan if the Reporter feels that they are not appropriate."

Important questions and even more important answers: Part 1

Isn't it amazing that after at least 5 years of being involved in local land use planning issues, carefully studying planning matters and seeking advice from many sources, the 'basics' of the planning system still seem to elude me.

Recent events have made me question the whole reason for the existence of planning as a discipline and I sought advice from a Planning Aid Scotland volunteer. I asked 2 basic questions, the first of which was:

Why is it specified that there should be a consultation on and an examination of a Proposed Plan? (What purpose do these exercises fulfill in terms of the planning process?)

The answer given was:

"...consultation on an emerging, or the proposed plan, allows for key stakeholders (members of the public, neighbouring councils, businesses (e.g. house builders), and statutory bodies (e.g. Scottish Natural Heritage and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency)) to comment on the policies contained within the proposed plan. Different stakeholders will each have different views as to how land use policy should be proposed within this plan. The comments received as a result of this consultation exercise will then be taken into account to finalise the proposed plan, which is then submitted to the Scottish Ministers. If there are still representations from stakeholders that have not been resolved, the proposed plan is then subject to examination (for all intents and purposes this is a planning inquiry). The examination will be undertaken by a Reporter, appointed by the Scottish Ministers, and the local authority have no role in determining who this Reporter will be. It is then the Reporter's responsibility to assess the outstanding representations on the Proposed Plan and ultimately report on how the representations should be taken into account (if appropriate), such as re-designating sites, policy areas etc."

The next question was:

If an LDP has 'emerged' as far as publication of the PP - but this PP still awaits consultation and examination - can the thought be entertained that once the PP is published then that is it and the rest of the development plan process is just a 'formality' with the likelihood of any significant alteration being made to the PP as a result of a representation being a remote possibility?

The answer will follow in PART 2

No more funding for Planning Aid England

Extract from Planning Daily:

The RTPI has confirmed that the government will not renew funding for Planning Aid after 31st March 2011.

In a statement the RTPI said it had held discussions with DCLG and during the meeting "officials said the government would be making available money for ‘neighbourhood planning’ for parties to bid for and that it was hoped that Planning Aid England would want to be part of this new approach."

Scotland and Wales have their own Planning Aid organisations and as far as I am aware it is business as usual with them. PA Scotland and PA Wales receive assistance from their respective Governments.

Given what APTSec perceives to be the close ties between the Scottish Government's commitment to public involvement in the new planning system and Planning Aid Scotland's role in upskilling the public to facilitate that involvement I cannot envisage PAS not continuing to receive support.

More here

Proposals for Tornagrain and Whiteness fade as Village plans gain momentum?

APTSec has been pouring over a plethora of documents as we approach the deadline - before 5pm on Friday 03 December ( Click here ) - for submissions to the Highland-wide Local Development Proposed Plan.

The more I read, the more I get the impression that there could well be a covert change of emphasis in terms of development in the A96 Corridor with a great deal more development being planned in smaller settlements.

The interesting thing is, what happens if - with lack of schools capacity and roads infrastructure restricting development at East Inverness and possible questions marks over Tornagrain and Whiteness - the key villages (and possibly other settlements) in the Inverness Housing Market Area cannot expand enough to satisfy the council's calculations in their Housing needs assessment? Will major developments in another Housing Market area, say the Nairn HMA, have to be accelerated through the forthcoming area plans?

Notes:

From HwLDP

The Council will support the development at Whiteness as part of the strategy to
provide a long term housing land supply in the area. Detailed masterplans will
accompany each phase of development in line with the current planning
permission, including provision in line with the already agreed upgrades to the
A96. The Council will also support the reuse of the site for renewables related
development, should the housing element not come forward.

Inverness, Nairn and A96 Corridor Transport Study

From 2011 to 2016, the early phases of the sites identified in the A96 Corridor
Framework were fed into the model. As set out in the Council’s Main Issues report
for the Highland wide Local Development Plan, the preferred strategy is to enable
the early phases of these developments based on adequate mitigation being
identified and provided, whether directly be developers themselves or in
partnership with the Council and Transport Scotland. The key developments
envisaged during this period include the Inverness Campus site at Beechwood, the
development of East Inverness at Stratton, small scale developments at Croy and
Cawdor, the early stages of Whiteness (where 50% of the housing is assumed to
be traditional “effective” housing and the remainder timeshare etc), and the
continued development of adopted Local Plan sites in Nairn (Lochloy and
Sandown/Delnies). The first phase of Tornagrain is assumed to start in 2016

Should councils be allowed to set application fees?

Interesting comments on this on the Planning blog today click here

What do you think?

Green Alternatives to Incineration

A little something for the public petitions committee

Calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to (a) immediately ban the construction of new waste incinerators and large biomass burners, and shut all existing plants within 5 years; (b) improve the monitoring of emissions from existing waste incinerators; and (c) accelerate Scotlands drive to reduce, reuse and recycle waste.

The content of the petition provides information on the potentially detrimental impact on pollution, climate change, public finance and non-renewable resources that burning of waste is likely to contribute to.

Petition here and background here

I have also received some interesting information on autoclaving of waste from Icare which will form the subject of a post HwLDP consultation period blog post

Icare here

Land Matters for the common good

For,

"Occasional thoughts and comments on land issues and other stuff by Andy Wightman"

Lots of interesting items here including items on Common Good.

(Also Land Value Tax here)

Land, Environment and Sustainability Strategy Group

A meeting of the Land, Environment and Sustainability Strategy Group will be held in the Well of the Chamber, Council Headquarters, Glenurquhart Road, Inverness on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 at 10.30 a.m.

Amongst matters for discussion:

• Council's Response to Draft Land Use Strategy for Scotland

• Report into Future Support for Agriculture in Scotland

• Post Legislative Scrutiny of Land Reform Act 2003

• Biodiversity Projects and Action update

• Marine Licensing

Agenda here

Wind, Woods and Development

What could be the council's official position with respect to On-shore Wind Energy, Developing in Woods and Sustainable Design? Councillors will be asked this week to agree that public consultation take place on the 3 pieces of supplementary guidance covering these areas.

Planning, Environment and Development Committee, Council Chamber, Council Headquarters, Glenurquhart Road, Inverness on Wednesday 17 November 2010 at 10.30am.

Click here for agenda (items 10,11, and 12)

Webcast Notice: This meeting will be filmed and broadcast over the Internet on the Highland Council website and will be archived and available for viewing for 12 months thereafter.

Between June 2010 and September 2010, 415 new houses were completed in the Highland Council area

Over 110 affordable homes were completed in the last quarter

See THC briefing note here

HwLDP now on Twitter and Facebook

Click on link to THC HwLDP blog to find out more

It is all too much admit it...

Hands up how many of us have diligently started to write our response to the numerous documents that comprise the consultation on the Highland-wide Local Development Plan. APTSec has yet to put pen to paper and the clock is ticking.

It seems to me, and forgive me for being personal here, I am suffering from not consultation fatigue but the gradual brain numbing effects of keeping track of the huge volume of the documents arising from the numbers of major planning applications (with all their various assessment), volumes of supplementary guidance and new development plan (again with various assessments and other reports in support).

Just how are we supposed to stand any chance of presenting what may be equally valid cases in planning terms? Weren't the changes in the planning system supposed to make things easier?

Action Packed Highland Council Agenda

A meeting of The Highland Council will take place in the Council Chamber, Council Headquarters, Glenurquhart Road, Inverness on Thursday, 28 October 2010 at 10.30am.

Full Agenda here

Items include:

• an update in regard to the current status of the Council’s ICT Transformation Programme.

• There is circulated Report No. HC-41-10 dated 12 October 2010 by the Chief Executive which provides an assessment of Council performance against the Corporate Plan and the ‘Strengthening the Highlands’ Programme and covers the period from April 2009 to the end of March 2010.

• There is circulated Report No.HC-42-10 dated 7 October 2010 by the Chief Executive which confirms that the Annual Performance Survey carried out in June/July 2010 was sent to the new Citizens Panel of 2354 people, designed to be representative of the adult population. With 1586 responses (67% response rate), the results can be generalised to the adult population of the Highlands.

• The Single Outcome Agreement SOA Annual Performance Report 2009-10 (2087kb pdf) is circulated separately.

• There is circulated Report No.HC-44-10 dated 18 October 2010 by the Director of Planning and Development which provides commentary on the current economic situation and details progress with the implementation of the Council’s Economic Downturn Action Plan.

• Highlands and Islands Enterprise – Potential Future Governance and Operations HC-45-10 dated 20 October 2010 See also Press Release here
  

• University of the Highlands and Islands: Application for University Title There is circulated Joint Report No.HC-46-10 dated 18 October 2010 by the Directors of Planning and Development and Education, Culture and Sport which asks Members to consider a response (attached as Appendix 1 to the report) to a Scottish Government invitation to comment on the University of the Highlands and Islands Millennium Institutes’ (UHIMI) application for University title.

Other items of interest on this agenda are covered by separate posts