Wind Energy Developments: Highland suggests 'counter to current' minimum separation distances...

13 Renewable energy

13.2

...Benefits and disbenefits for communities  – Scottish Government should consider introducing minimum separation distances to dwellings the occupiers of which are not financially involved  in the wind energy development. It is appreciated that this would run counter to the current approach: that each proposal is dealt with on its merits, based on assessment, with a view to maximising opportunities for renewables. However, it would provide a measure of comfort and certainty as to a minimum safeguard and may 
increase the likelihood that submitted schemes that respect such separation could be supported. It is suggested that only by such an approach being enshrined in national policy (or legislation) can it carry substantial weight in decision-making. It would also be helpful if SPP made it clear that, and 
explained how, safety is largely an issue outwith planning consideration, whilst acknowledging that it is an important matter involving risk assessment for the developer as part of the project design and management process. 

Extract taken from, 'REVIEW OF SCOTTISH PLANNING POLICY' - Report to PED at link here


(REVIEW OF SCOTTISH PLANNING POLICY - Highland states: This report informs the Committee of the review of Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) being undertaken by the Scottish Government.  The Committee is asked to consider the draft Highland Council response on the first stage of the review of the Scottish Planning Policy contained in Appendix 1. )

(A meeting of the Planning, Environment and Development Committee will take place in the Council Chamber, Council Headquarters, Glenurquhart Road, Inverness onWednesday, 16 January 2013 at 10.30am.)

PED agenda here