Thursday, 28 July 2011
Flood Risk Management
Green Networks
Green networks are webs of green spaces and green corridors within and around towns and villages and the wider countryside. These help enhance an area's wildlife and quality of life for people in the area. The new guidance sets out how developers can take green networks into account in design proposals, the council’s role in assessing planning applications, and ways in which developer contributions can be sought.
SSCI Charrette announcement; no Sandown?
Building on the SSCI Charrette Series which ran in March 2010, the Scottish Government has launched a new charrette programme, aimed at mainstreaming this approach to development in the built environment within Scottish design and planning practice.
Following the submission of 12 projects for the Mainstreaming Programme, the initial projects which have been selected to participate in the initiative are:
- Callander: Proposer, The Callander Partnership on behalf of Callander Community Council
- Johnstone South West: Proposer, Renfrewshire Council
- South Carrick , Girvan: Proposer, South Ayrshire Council
Dear George
Dear George
Following the publication of the latest GDP figures yesterday highlighting that the strength of the recovery in the UK remains weak, I am writing to urge the UK Government to do more to accelerate the recovery...
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2011/07/27145951Sunday, 24 July 2011
Northern Ireland population at 30 June 2010
~ Thursday, 30 June 2011
Corridor of Power
New Scottish Open host Castle Stuart Golf Links lies within a strip of land with a bloody past and, in the future, could become one of the most developed areas of the Highlands and Islands.
Known as the A96 Corridor, the strip covers several hundreds of acres stretching between Inverness and Nairn and flanked by the Moray Firth and the B9006 road.
Highland Council has produced a masterplan to guide development in the area over the next 30 years.
What has already been planned could make the corridor powerful in terms of job creation and the delivery of further education in the region.
More hereWednesday, 20 July 2011
At Last! Something to get your teeth into - latest Examiner's request and Council response
Planners 'unhelpful' say business body
In a report based on a survey of its members, it blasted planning officers as "unhelpful", "anti-growth" and having "little understanding of and regard for the needs of small businesses".
It added that the vast majority of its members who had used the planning system found it to be "utterly impenetrable".
The report said: "This complexity, cost and the unhelpful culture of planning officers create a disincentive to submit even a minor planning application."
Tuesday, 19 July 2011
Examiners must be hard at work
Open Space in New Residential Developments
Planning Permission in Principle - note 1
Extract
On
Planning permission in principle alone does not give you a right to go ahead with the proposal as conditions will be attached setting out what further details require to be approved by way of a further application before work can start - approval of matters specified in conditions.
If the proposal is sensitive it is possible that details will be required before a decision is reached.
Thursday, 14 July 2011
Out-of town development; why no stats?
The daily E Planning newsletter reports that the (presumably English):
‘…Government is proposing to stop collecting its own data on the proportion of retail development taking place in town centres.’
The move comes despite the abolition in 2009 by the Labour Government of the need test, which required developers to show need for proposed edge-of-town or out-of-town stores.
The abolition came despite warnings from the RTPI that it could accelerate the decline of the high street, and surveys that showed that twice as many senior local authority planning officers thought that it would undermine town centres than that it would not.
The Conservatives, then in opposition, said that if elected, they would reinstate the test.
The Department of Communities and Local Government pledged in 2008, in response to a select committee report, that it would publish data on the proportion of retail development that is located in town centres every year.
The committee had said that the Government needed to improve its collection and publication of statistics on town centres to ensure adequate monitoring of the results of the need test abolition.
However, in February last year a DCLG consultation document proposed releasing the data only biannually. A summary of responses to the consultation, published in October, said no decision had been made on the proposal.
But a wider DCLG consultation, launched in April this year, on departmental data-gathering proposes ending the collection of statistics on the extent of retail development taking place in town centres due to the "high cost of purchase and analysis" of the data.
The document suggests that, given the necessary resources, data could be procured from private companies offering monitoring services.
Planning journalists came across the latest proposal as they researched an article, which appears in the current issue of the magazine, exploring whether retail development was moving out of town.
Lobby group the British Council of Shopping Centres said it was concerned by the news. "More frequent and localised data on where development is taking place is essential if government is to monitor the impacts of policies and respond effectively," said executive director Edward Cooke.
Just off to check if they collect data in Scotland
(The article by Richard Garlick, Adam Branson and Susanna Gillman Thursday, 14 July 2011 can be found here)
Scottish Planning Series Circular 4 2009: Development Management Procedures
Extract
The planning system operates in the long term public interest. It does not exist to protect the interests of one person or business against the activities of another. In distinguishing between public and private interests, the basic question is whether the proposal would unacceptably affect the amenity and existing use of land and buildings which ought to be protected in the public interest, not whether owners or occupiers of neighbouring or other existing properties would experience financial or other loss from a particular development.
Full document here